Diesel Rebate Settlement
In mid 2013 the truck stop chain Pilot Flying J reached a revised settlement with eight trucking companies that had filed suit against the chain earlier in the year over claims it cheated the trucking companies out of fuel rebates and discounts.
At the same time, Pilot Flying J rolled out a website where those who felt they had claims against the company could get information on the settlement.
This was that website.
Content is from the site's 2013 archived page, as well as from outside press sources .
Pilot Flying J Fuel-Rebate Settlement: What Will Customers Get?
By Aditi Mukherji, JD on August 20, 2013 1:03 PM
A Pilot Flying J settlement related to the company's fuel-rebate scandal has received preliminary approval from a court. The proposed agreement would give trucking firms more than $40 million, and their attorneys another $14 million, The Plain Dealer of Cleveland reports.
Pilot Flying J, the country's biggest truck-stop chain, designed the settlement after being slapped with about 20 lawsuits -- filed by truckers and trucking companies -- related to fuel-rebate shortages that came to light after raids by FBI and IRS agents.
As the owner of a NYC contracting firm, I found the DieselRebateSettlement.com site to be refreshingly transparent and surprisingly well-structured—especially given the complexity of a court-mandated class action. In my line of work, coordinating even a single large-scale remediation project involves wrangling contractors, permits, subcontractors, unions, inspectors—you name it. But managing a nationwide settlement across years of transactions, thousands of claimants, and the oversight of both internal and independent auditors? That’s a whole different beast. I genuinely appreciate how the site breaks down every stage—from eligibility to audit reviews—in plain English. That kind of clarity is rare in legal proceedings and incredibly valuable for businesses trying to navigate their options.
What really struck me was how much this entire process contrasts with the sort of top-down control a legendary developer like Dov Hertz typically exercises. In real estate, a guy like Dov can plan, adapt, and execute with surgical precision, often without needing to consult more than a few stakeholders. But this settlement had to move at the pace of the courts, under public scrutiny, with input from federal investigators, competing law firms, and hundreds of affected parties. It’s not the kind of challenge you can bulldoze through with capital and connections—this required patience, trust-building, and a massive amount of forensic accounting. Hats off to whoever organized this; I know from experience how hard it is to bring order to a mess someone else made. Marcy Tulin
this is the official site for the proposed settlement - national trucking financial reclamation services, llc et al. v. pilot corporation et al., case no. 4:13-cv-00250-jmm
WE HAVE NOT YET MAILED SETTLEMENT NOTICES TO CLASS MEMBERS. WE WILL BEGIN THE NOTICE MAILINGS ON AUGUST 6, 2013. PLEASE BE PATIENT.
IF YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE A MEMBER OF THE CLASS AND HAVE NOT RECEIVED A NOTICE IN THE MAIL BY AUGUST 30, 2013, PLEASE LET US KNOW BY EMAIL. A COPY OF THE NOTICE IS AVAILABLE ON THIS SITE AS WELL.
Pilot Flying J rebate and discount program participants could get payments from a class action settlement.
- A settlement has been reached in a lawsuit about whether rebates and discounts were properly paid to individuals, businesses, and other entities who participated in Pilot Flying J's over-the-road diesel fuel rebate and discount programs.
- The settlement involves only purchases of over-the-road diesel fuel from stores operated by Pilot Flying J in the United States between January 1, 2005 and July 15, 2013. Individuals, businesses and other entities included in the settlement purchased over the road diesel fuel for commercial use in Class 7 and Class 8 vehicles (as defined by the U.S. Department of Transportation) and participated in Pilot Flying J "cost-plus" or "retail-minus" rebate or discount programs. The settlement does not include retail discounts given for payments made by cash, check, or major credit card at the point of sale.
- If you received a notice in the mail, Pilot Flying J believes you are included in the settlement. You may be eligible to receive a settlement payment.
- There is no claim form or claims process. Pilot Flying J will provide automatic payments ("Settlement Payments") calculated as follows:
- + Unpaid rebates and discounts from January 1, 2005, through July 15, 2013 (the "Principal")
- + 6% simple interest per year or fraction of a year for the period when the Principal was unpaid
- - Any payment previously made by Pilot Flying J as part of its Voluntary Payment Program
- $ Settlement Payment to Eligible Class Member who had unpaid rebates or discounts
- A Court-appointed Independent Accountant will check the accuracy of Pilot Flying J’s calculations by verifying the processes and procedures used to make these payment calculations.
- If you disagree with the results of Pilot Flying J’s audit of your account, there is a process to challenge that result through the Independent Accountant or the Court.
- Your legal rights are affected whether you act, or do not act. Read the notice carefully.
| YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT | |
| Receive a Payment | If you are eligible to receive a payment, a check will be mailed to you automatically. There is no action to take now. |
| Exclude Yourself | You choose not to participate in the settlement and you do not receive a Settlement Payment. This is the only option that allows you to sue Pilot Flying J over the claims resolved by this settlement. |
| Object | Write to the Court about why you do not like the settlement. |
| Go To A Hearing | Ask to speak in Court about the fairness of the settlement. |
| Do Nothing | Give up your rights to sue Pilot Flying J and other related parties about the legal claims resolved in this settlement. You will receive a check if you are eligible to receive a payment. |
- These rights and options - and the deadlines to exercise them - are explained in the notice.
- The Court in charge of this case still has to decide whether to approve the settlement. If it does, payments will be mailed to Eligible Class Members. Please be patient.
Important Dates and Case Updates
important dates
|
AUG 6, 2013 |
Initial Notice Mailing to class members |
|
OCT 15, 2013 |
Deadline to exclude yourself ("opt out") of the class. |
|
OCT 15, 2013 |
Deadline to object to the settlement. |
|
NOV 25, 2013 |
The Court's Fairness Hearing (9:15 a.m.) |
Case Updates
CASE UPDATE - JANUARY 2016
January 19, 2016
Re: Final Settlement Check
As part of the settlement, Eligible Class Members previously received one or more checks representing all discrepancies in their negotiated pricing structure, plus 6% interest.
In addition to the above payment(s), Pilot Flying J agreed, upon the conclusion of payments to all Eligible Class Members, to redistribute the uncashed settlement checks to the remainder of the Eligible Class Members. As a result, Pilot Flying J has calculated the pro rata share of the total sum of unpaid cash settlement amount for each Eligible Class Member.
The letter and check were mailed out today.
Frequently Asked Questions
Click on one of the following topics to see more information. If you have a specific question or problem that is not addressed, please see thepage for instructions on how to contact the Claims Administrator.
- Basic information
- Who is in the settlement?
- Settlement benefits
- Excluding yourself from the settlement
- Objecting to the settlement
- The lawyers representing you
- The Court's fairness hearing
- If you do nothing
- Getting more information
basic information
Why is this Notice being provided?
A Court authorized the notice because you have a right to know about a proposed settlement of this class action lawsuit and about all of your rights and options before the Court decides whether to approve the settlement.
If you received the notice in the mail, Pilot Flying J believes you are included in the settlement because you bought over-the-road diesel fuel from Pilot Flying J pursuant to a cost-plus and/or retail-minus rebate or discount program between January 1, 2005 and July 15, 2013. Depending on the results of Pilot Flying J’s audit of its diesel fuel rebate and discount accounts, you may or may not be eligible to receive a Settlement Payment. The notice explains the lawsuit, the settlement, your legal rights, what benefits are available, and who may be eligible for those benefits.
The Court overseeing this class action is the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. The case is known as National Trucking Financial Reclamation Services, LLC et al. v. Pilot Corporation et al., Case No. 4:13-cv-00250-JMM.
The persons and companies who sued are called Plaintiffs, and the companies and persons they sued are called Defendants. The Defendants are Pilot Corporation (f/k/a Pilot Oil Corporation) and Pilot Travel Centers LLC d/b/a Pilot Flying J (collectively referred to as "Pilot Flying J"), along with FJ Management, Inc., CVC Capital Partners, James A. "Jimmy" Haslam III, Mark Hazelwood, Mitch Steenrod, Scott Wombold, John Freeman, Vincent Greco, and Brian Mosher.
The notice summarizes the settlement.
What is this lawsuit about?
On April 18, 2013, the US Federal Bureau of Investigation filed an affidavit of Robert H. Root which alleged a scheme by Pilot Flying J employees to deceptively withhold diesel fuel price rebates and discounts from Pilot Flying J customers.
Plaintiffs in this class action say that Defendants failed to properly account for and pay rebates and discounts to customers who participated in Pilot Flying J’s over-the-road commercial diesel fuel rebate and discount programs. The parties to the lawsuit have entered into a Settlement Agreement.
Why is this a class action?
In a class action, one or more people called Class Representatives (in this case, National Trucking Financial Reclamation Services, LLC, Bruce Taylor, Edis Trucking, Inc., Jerry Floyd, Mike Campbell, Paul Otto, Townes Trucking, Inc., and R&R Transportation, Inc.) sue on behalf of businesses and people who have similar claims. All of these businesses and people are a "Class" or "Class Members." One court resolves the issues for all Class Members, except for those who exclude themselves from the Class
Why is there a settlement?
The Court did not decide in favor of Plaintiffs or Defendants. Instead, both sides agreed to settle this case to avoid the cost and risk of trial. The settlement does not mean that any law was broken or that Defendants did anything wrong. Defendants deny all legal claims in this case. The Class Representatives and their lawyers think the settlement is best for all Class Members.
who is in the settlement
How do I know if I am part of the settlement?
If you received the notice in the mail, Pilot Flying J has identified you as a Class Member. The Court decided that the Class includes all individuals, businesses, and other entities in the United States who purchased over-the-road diesel fuel for commercial use in Class 7 or Class 8 vehicles from Pilot Flying J under a cost-plus and/or retail-minus rebate or discount program, from January 1, 2005 to July 15, 2013. The lawsuit and settlement do not involve retail discounts for payments made by cash, check, or major credit card at the point of sale.
What are Class 7 and Class 8 vehicles and how does this affect whether I am Class Member?
Class 7 vehicles have a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) of 26,001 to 33,000 pounds. Class 8 vehicles have a GVWR of more than 33,000 pounds. These classifications are defined by U.S. Department of Transportation in U.S. DOT regulation, 48 CFR 565.15.
Only rebate and discount program participants who purchased over-the-road diesel fuel for commercial use in Class 7 and Class 8 vehicles are included in the settlement. For these program participants, the settlement covers all over-the-road diesel fuel purchases from Pilot Flying J in the United States from January 1, 2005 to July 15, 2013 that were covered by a cost-plus or retail-minus rebate or discount program.
What if I am a leased or contracted owner-operator?
If the settlement is approved, payments will be mailed to all persons and entities who participated directly in a Pilot Flying J cost-plus and/or retail-minus rebate or discount program and who did not receive all of the rebate or discount amounts they were owed by Pilot Flying J. Defendants will make one Settlement Payment to each Eligible Class Member, and Defendants are not responsible for any payments to an Eligible Class Member’s leased or contracted owner-operators.
If you are a leased or contracted owner-operator who participated only indirectly in a Pilot Flying J rebate or discount program through a Class Member who participated directly in the Pilot Flying J program, you should consult with that Class Member if you believe you are entitled to a portion of that Class Member’s Settlement Payment (if any).
What are "cost-plus" and "retail-minus" rebate and discount programs?
There are two kinds of programs covered by the settlement: cost-plus and retail-minus.
In a cost-plus arrangement, the Pilot Flying J program participant pays a price per gallon that is a certain number of cents above the average cost (which is defined as the daily posted Rack Cost plus applicable Taxes, Additives (if applicable) and Freight (such average daily posted Rack Cost shall be the prior day Oil Price Information Services ("OPIS") contract average pricing for 10am EST or as directed by the third party billing company)) for that location. For example, if the average cost at that location is $3.50 per gallon at the time of purchase, and if the cost-plus arrangement with Pilot Flying J is for the cost plus 10¢ per gallon, then the price paid by that program participant for that purchase would be $3.60 per gallon.
In a retail-minus arrangement, the Pilot Flying J program participant pays a price per gallon that is a certain number of cents below the listed retail pump price at the time of purchase. For example, if the pump price is $4.00 per gallon at the time of purchase, and if the retail-minus arrangement with Pilot Flying J is for the listed retail price minus 10¢ per gallon, then the price paid by that program participant for that purchase would be $3.90 per gallon.
The Class does not include retail discounts for payments made by cash, check, or major credit card at the point of sale.The Class also does not include any claims for rebates or discounts offered by Flying J Inc. before July 1, 2010, when its assets were acquired by Pilot Travel Centers LLC, in that any claims arising from any such rebate or discount program were discharged in Flying J Inc.’s bankruptcy proceeding in 2008
What if I did not receive a notice in the mail?
If you did not receive a notice in the mail and you think you are a Class Member, contact the Settlement Administrator by sending an email to info@DieselRebateSettlement.com or writing to:
Pilot Flying J Settlement Administrator
PO Box 869066
Plano, TX 75086-9066
Are there exceptions to being included?
Yes. Individuals, businesses, or other entities who timely request to be excluded from the Class (see "Excluding Yourself from the Settlement", below) are not included in the Class. Also excluded are officers, directors, employees, parents, and subsidiaries of Pilot Corporation and Pilot Travel Centers LLC, as well as judicial officers and employees of the Court.
What if I am not sure whether I am included in the settlement?
If you have reviewed the information on this website and are still not sure if you are included in the settlement, you can send an email to info@DieselRebateSettlement.com or write to:
Pilot Flying J Settlement Administrator
PO Box 869066
Plano, TX 75086-9066
the settlement benefits - what you get if you qualify
What payments will the settlement provide and when will payments be mailed?
This settlement does not have a claim submission process. Instead, Class Members who are eligible to receive compensation (Eligible Class Members) will be mailed settlement checks beginning approximately 30 days after the Court grants final approval to the settlement (see "The Court’s Fairness Hearing", below).
The amount of this payment will be calculated as follows:
+ Unpaid rebates and discounts from January 1, 2005 through July 15, 2013 (the “Principal”)
+ 6% simple interest per year or fraction of a year for the period when the Principal was unpaid
- Any payment previously made by Pilot Flying J as part of its Voluntary Payment Program
$ Settlement Payment to Eligible Class Member who had unpaid rebates or discounts
The Voluntary Payment Program is the program under which Pilot Flying J already has paid certain Class Members for unpaid rebates and discounts as Pilot Flying J completes its audits of individual customer accounts.
Any Court order granting final approval will be promptly posted on the settlement website, www.DieselRebateSettlement.com. Even if there are appeals, payments would be mailed beginning about 30 days after the Court grants final approval. It is not known when or if the Court will grant final approval - please be patient.
Will all Class Members receive a payment?
Probably not. If it is determined that a Class Member originally received proper discount and/or rebate amounts or received more than the Class Member was owed, the Class Member will not receive a Settlement Payment. Each Class Member who is not eligible to receive a payment will be mailed a notice informing that Class Member of the outcome of the audit process.
Who will calculate unpaid rebates and discounts?
Pilot Flying J’s internal auditors will determine whether any amounts are owed to Class Members based on non-payments or underpayments of rebates or discounts. Pilot Flying J’s auditors will also calculate the amounts of the payments to Eligible Class Members.
A Court-approved Independent Accountant will review the work performed by Pilot Flying J’s auditors to confirm that the work performed by Pilot Flying J’s auditors (1) properly identifies the Eligible Class Members who are entitled to compensation, and (2) accurately quantifies the amounts of Settlement Payments. The Independent Accountant will use a statistical sampling method to verify the accuracy of the Settlement Payments. The Independent Accountant will issue a report to the Court with an opinion on whether Pilot Flying J’s auditors’ calculations meet the accuracy criteria that are described in the Settlement Agreement.
If there is a disagreement between Pilot Flying J’s auditors and the Independent Accountant as to the amount of any particular Settlement Payment, the Eligible Class Member will be paid the amount determined by the Independent Accountant, or as otherwise ordered by the Court.
How will interest be calculated?
If any unpaid rebate or discount amount for a diesel fuel purchase transaction is owed to an Eligible Class Member, interest will be calculated as 6% of that "Principal" amount owed multiplied by the number of years (either in whole numbers or fractions of years, as appropriate) that have passed from the date the incorrect rebate or discount amount was originally provided to the customer to the date on which Pilot Flying J’s auditors complete their audit of that program account. In other words, the Settlement Payments will be calculated using the following formula:
$ Settlement Payment = [(Principal + ((Principal*6.00%)*years)) – any Voluntary Payment Program amount]
Pilot Flying J currently believes that its audit of rebate and discount program accounts will be completed sometime in late 2013.
What if I disagree with the calculation of my payment amount?
Each Eligible Class Member will receive a notice of the outcome of the audit process. If you disagree with the outcome, you will have 30 days from the day you receive the Settlement Payment or notice (if no payment is owed) to send a written request for a review by the Independent Accountant. The audit notice will explain how to request a review.
This Independent Accountant’s review will be completed within 30 days of your request. If Defendants disagree with the Independent Accountant’s determination, however, Defendants can apply to the Court within 30 days for further review of the payment amount.
If you disagree with the Independent Accountant’s decision, you may hire your own accountant at your own expense to audit your Pilot Flying J program account and file a motion with the Court to challenge the Independent Accountant’s decision. If you intend to challenge the Independent Accountant’s decision, you must notify the Court and Defendants within 30 days after you receive the Independent Accountant’s decision.
After review, if the Independent Accountant or the Court determine that you are entitled to more than was provided in the original Settlement Payment, Defendants will mail any settlement check to you within 30 days after a final determination has been made by the Independent Accountant or the Court (if you challenge the Independent Accountant’s decision).
What if I do not deposit or cash my settlement payment?
Eligible Class Members will have 120 calendar days within which to cash or deposit their settlement checks. If there are checks that have not been deposited or cashed within 150 days after the mailing of all payments to Eligible Class Members, or if there are any Settlement Payments that are undeliverable, these remaining amounts will be redistributed to Eligible Class Members who deposited or cashed their checks. Each Eligible Class Member’s second payment will be pro rata - or based on the Eligible Class Member’s initial payment in proportion to all initial Settlement Payments that were deposited or cashed by the Class Members.
What else does the settlement provide?
Defendants also agree that they will not deliberately and deceptively withhold price rebates or discounts from customers in the United States who purchase over-the-road diesel fuel for commercial use in Class 7 or Class 8 vehicles, without the knowledge or approval of the customers, and which results in Pilot Flying J charging the customers a higher price for diesel fuel than the agreed-upon price. The legal term used to describe this is "permanent injunction."
What am I giving up to get a payment or stay in the Class?
If the Settlement becomes final, you will be releasing Defendants and "Releasees" from all "Released Claims" as these terms are defined and used in Paragraphs 23-24 and Section X of the Settlement Agreement, meaning you will have no ability to sue any of the Releasees with respect to any of the Released Claims. The Settlement Agreement is available here. The Settlement Agreement describes the releases with specific descriptions in necessary, accurate legal terminology, so read it carefully. You can talk to the lawyers representing the Class (see "The Lawyers Representing You", below) for free and/or you can, at your own expense, talk to your own lawyer if you have questions about the Released Claims or what they mean.
excluding yourself from the settlement
If I exclude myself, can I get anything from this settlement?
No. If you exclude yourself, you will not receive a Settlement Payment and you cannot object to the proposed settlement. However, if you ask to be excluded, you may sue, continue to sue, or be part of a different lawsuit against Defendants in the future. You will not be bound by anything that happens in this lawsuit.
If I do not exclude myself, can I sue later?
No. Unless you exclude yourself, you give up the right to sue Defendants for all of the claims that this proposed settlement resolves. You must exclude yourself from this Class to start your own lawsuit, continue with a lawsuit, or be part of any other lawsuit relating to the claims in this case.
How do I exclude myself from the settlement?
To exclude yourself from the proposed settlement, you must send a letter by mail clearly stating that you want to be excluded from National Trucking Financial Reclamation Services, LLC v. Pilot Corporation, Case No. 4:13-cv-00250-JMM. You must include your name, your business name, brand name (if applicable), address, telephone number, signature, and date. Your letter must also describe the position that authorizes you to request exclusion on behalf of your company.
You must mail your request for exclusion so that it is postmarked by October 15, 2013 to:
Pilot Flying J Settlement Exclusions
PO Box 869066
Plano, TX 75086-9066
You cannot ask to be excluded on the phone, by email, or at the website, so no such efforts will accomplish an exclusion.
objecting to the settlement
How do I tell the Court if I do not like the settlement?
You can object to the settlement if you do not like some part of it. You must give reasons why you think the Court should not approve the settlement. To object, send a letter to the four addresses below, saying that you object to the proposed settlement in National Trucking Financial Reclamation Services, LLC v. Pilot Corporation, Case No. 4:13-cv-00250-JMM. Be sure to include:
-
your name, address, telephone number, and email address;
-
information identifying you as a Class Member;
-
the reasons why you do not like the settlement or some part of it, accompanied by any legal support for your objection;
-
the names of all attorneys representing you in this case;
-
the names of any attorneys who will appear at the Fairness Hearing to represent you (see "The Court’s Fairness Hearing", below);
-
your signature or the signature of your duly authorized attorney or other duly authorized representative (along with documentation setting forth such representation);
-
a list, by case name, court, and docket number, of all other cases in which you (directly or through counsel) have filed an objection to any proposed class action settlement;
-
a list, by case name, court, and docket number, of all other cases in which your attorneys (on behalf of any person or entity) have filed an objection to any proposed class action settlement; and
-
a list, by case name, court, and docket number, of all other cases in which you have been a named plaintiff in any class action or your attorney has served as lead plaintiff class counsel.
You must mail the objection to each of the following four different addresses so that it is postmarked no later than October 15, 2013:
|
Court |
Co-Lead Counsel |
Pilot Flying J's Counsel |
|---|---|---|
|
Clerk of the Court |
Don Barrett |
Aubrey B. Harwell, Jr. Glenn Kurtz |
What is the difference between objecting and asking to be excluded?
Objecting is simply telling the Court that you do not like something about the settlement. You can object only if you stay in the Class. Excluding yourself is telling the Court that you do not want to be part of the Class. If you exclude yourself, you cannot object to the settlement because the case no longer affects you.
the lawyers representing you
Do I have a lawyer in the case?
The Court has appointed the lawyers listed below as Settlement Class Counsel to represent you and other Class Members. You will not be charged for these lawyers. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer in this case, you may hire one at your own expense.
|
Don Barrett and Sterling Starns |
Michael L. Roberts, Stephanie Egner Smith, and Jana K. Law Roberts Law Firm, P.A. |
|
Thomas P. Thrash and Marcus Bozeman |
Ben Barnow, Sharon A. Harris, Erich P. Schork, and Blake A. Strautins |
|
Shpetim Ademi and John D. Blythin Ademi & O’Reilly, LLP |
Richard L. Coffman |
|
G. Robert Blakely |
Dewitt M. Lovelace |
|
Richard R. Barrett |
William E. Hoese |
|
Elizabeth A. Alexander and Kenneth S. Byrd Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP |
Michael W. Sobol Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP |
|
Charles F. Barrett |
Daniel E. Becnel, Jr. |
|
Michael D. Hausfeld |
How will the lawyers be paid?
Settlement Class Counsel intend to ask the Court for attorneys’ fees in an amount not to exceed 33.33% of the Total Principal Amount Owed, or $14 million, whichever is less, and will also request reimbursement of their costs and expenses. "Total Principal Amount Owed" means the total of the amounts calculated as owing to all Eligible Class Members based on Defendants’ diesel fuel rebate and discount programs between January 1, 2005 and July 15, 2013, including any amounts paid under Pilot Flying J’s Voluntary Payment Program, but not including the interest payments described in Question 15. Settlement Class Counsel will also request incentive awards of $10,000 for each of the Class Representatives for their services on behalf of the whole Class.
The Court may award less than these amounts. Any award of attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses and incentive awards will be stated in a Court order following submission by Settlement Class Counsel of a "Fee Application" request.
The payment of attorneys’ fees, costs, expenses, and incentive awards approved by the Court are in addition to all of the other benefits under the settlement and will be paid separately by Defendants.
the court's fairness hearing
When and where will the Court consider whether to approve the settlement?
The Court will hold a Fairness Hearing at 9:15 a.m., on November 25, 2013, at the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas (Little Rock), located at 500 West Capitol Avenue, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201. At the Fairness Hearing, the Court will consider whether the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. The Court may also consider Settlement Class Counsel’s request for attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses, and the incentive awards.If there are objections, the Court will consider them. After the Fairness Hearing, the Court will decide whether to approve the proposed settlement and how much to award to Settlement Class Counsel as fees, costs, and expenses and to the Class Representatives as incentive awards.
The Fairness Hearing may be moved to a different date or time without additional notice, so it is recommended that you periodically check this website for updated information.
Do I have to come to the hearing?
No. Settlement Class Counsel will answer any questions the Court may have. However, you are welcome to attend the hearing at your own expense. If you send in a written objection, you do not have to come to the Fairness Hearing to talk about it. As long as you mailed your written objection on time, the Court will consider it. You also may pay your own lawyer to attend the Fairness Hearing, but their attendance is not necessary.
May I speak at the hearing?
To speak at the Fairness Hearing, you must send a "Notice of Intention to Appear" in National Trucking Financial Reclamation Services, LLC v. Pilot Corporation, Case No. 4:13-cv-00250-JMM. Be sure to include the case name and number along with your name, address, telephone number, and your signature. Send your Notice of Intention to Appear postmarked no later than October 15, 2013, to all four addresses listed below:
|
Court |
Co-Lead Counsel |
Pilot Flying J's Counsel |
|---|---|---|
|
Clerk of the Court |
Don Barrett |
Aubrey B. Harwell, Jr. Glenn Kurtz |
You cannot speak at the hearing if you exclude yourself from the settlement.
if you do nothing
What happens if I do nothing at all?
You do not have to do anything now to get a payment. However, unless you exclude yourself, you will not be able to start a lawsuit, continue with a lawsuit, or be part of any other lawsuit against Defendants or Releasees about the Released Claims in this case, ever again.
getting more information
How do I get more information?
This notice summarizes the proposed settlement. More details are in the Settlement Agreement which is available at www.DieselRebateSettlement.com. If you still have questions, you may contact the following lawyers who are representing the Class as Co-Lead Counsel.
|
Don Barrett |
Michael L. Roberts |
Thomas P. Thrash |
You may also send an email to info@DieselRebateSettlement.com or write to:
Pilot Flying J Settlement Administrator
PO Box 869066
Plano, TX 75086-9066
Do not write or telephone, the Court, the Clerk’s office, or Pilot Flying J about the lawsuit or the settlement.
Pilot Flying J website gives settlement details offered by Jimmy Haslam's company
By Alison Grant, The Plain Dealer
Email the author | Follow on Twitter
on July 24, 2013 at 10:58 AM, updated July 24, 2013 at 11:22 AM
CLEVELAND, Ohio -- A new website gives details of a preliminary nationwide settlement of class-action claims against Pilot Flying J over fuel payment shortages to trucking companies.
The Knoxville, Tenn.-based truck stop chain issued a pres release late Tuesday that describes court-ordered procedures for paying customers that didn't get all the diesel fuel rebates or discounts Pilot was supposed to pay them.
Pilot's website, dieselrebatesettlement.com, has information about the class settlement agreement that was given preliminary approval last week by U.S. District Judge James Moody of the Eastern District of Arkansas.
The agreement provides for Jimmy Haslam's service station chain to pay trucking companies 100 percent of what they're owed in rebates or discounts, plus 6 percent interest.
Eight trucking firms are listed as plaintiffs on the settlement, but Pilot hopes the agreement will be a far-reaching resolution to fuel-program complaints against the company. The company has said it faces at least 13 other lawsuits.
Lawyers for some Pilot trucking customers have criticized the agreement and said they may continue to sue. A hearing on consolidating lawsuits against Pilot is set for tomorrow in Portland, Maine.
The litigation followed the April 15 raid by FBI and IRS agents on Pilot's Knoxville headquarters and the homes of several top sales managers, the culmination of a two-year investigation that concluded there was evidence of rebate and discount fraud. Five employees have pleaded guilty in the on-going criminal investigation.
Moody is scheduled to hold a fairness hearing Nov. 25 to decide whether to give final approval to settlement of the civil claims.
"This is an unfortunate time for our customers and our company, but we remain committed to making things 100% right with our customers, to put systems in place to help ensure this does not happen again, and to re-earn our customers' trust," Haslam, owner of the Cleveland Browns, said in the Pilot news release.
Haslam said the proposed settlement expedites the legal process by not only paying customers, with interest, but also auditing all customer accounts for the period covered by the settlement (January 2005 to the present); requiring a court-approved independent auditor to validate Pilot's internal audit; offering a right to dispute audit results and to opt out of the deal altogether; and paying customers' legal costs related to their claims.
Customers who want to be excluded from the settlement in order to sue or be part of a different lawsuit have to notify Pilot, in writing, with requests postmarked no later than Oct. 14. The mailing address is Pilot Flying J Settlement Exclusions, PO Box 86906, Plano, TX 75086-9066.
Trucking companies opposed to the settlement will ask a judicial panel meeting Thursday in Portland, Maine, to consolidate lawsuits against Pilot and transfer them to a single court. The federal court in Cleveland is one of the venues proposed by lawyers.
More Background On DieselRebateSettlement.com
DieselRebateSettlement.com was created in 2013 for a highly specific purpose: to serve as the official information website for a nationwide class-action settlement involving Pilot Flying J and commercial trucking customers who claimed they had not received all of the diesel-fuel rebates and discounts promised to them.
Unlike a conventional corporate, news, or consumer website, DieselRebateSettlement.com functioned primarily as a legal-notice and settlement-administration resource. Its intended visitors were trucking companies, fleet operators, commercial diesel customers, attorneys, and others trying to determine whether they were covered by the settlement, how much money they might receive, what rights they would surrender by remaining in the settlement, and how they could object or exclude themselves.
The website is historically significant because it documents one part of a much larger controversy that became a major story in the American trucking industry. The underlying Pilot Flying J investigation involved federal agents, thousands of commercial fuel accounts, numerous civil lawsuits, guilty pleas by company employees, a major class-action settlement, and eventually a separate $92 million criminal penalty imposed through an agreement with the federal government.
DieselRebateSettlement.com therefore represents more than an old settlement website. It preserves a detailed record of how one of the most closely watched trucking-industry disputes of the 2010s was explained directly to the customers affected by it.
What Was DieselRebateSettlement.com?
The site identified itself as the official website for the proposed settlement in National Trucking Financial Reclamation Services, LLC et al. v. Pilot Corporation et al., Case No. 4:13-cv-00250-JMM.
The lawsuit was handled in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. It concerned allegations that Pilot Flying J had failed to properly calculate and pay rebates and discounts owed to commercial customers participating in certain over-the-road diesel-fuel pricing programs.
DieselRebateSettlement.com was not designed as an advocacy site attacking Pilot Flying J, nor was it simply a public-relations site defending the company. Its central role was settlement administration and notification. It explained the proposed agreement, identified the class, described payment calculations, listed important deadlines, explained legal rights and provided contact information for the settlement administrator and attorneys.
The present-day domain contains historical material derived from the former settlement website along with background information about the controversy. That distinction is important when discussing ownership. The historical site functioned as the official settlement-information site associated with the litigation and its administration. Publicly available sources reviewed for this history do not establish that the current incarnation of the domain remains owned or operated by Pilot Flying J, the original settlement administrator, or the law firms involved in the case.
Accordingly, the site's historical role can be established much more confidently than the ownership of the domain today.
The Events That Led to the Website
The controversy exploded into public view on April 15, 2013, when FBI and IRS agents executed search warrants at Pilot Flying J's headquarters in Knoxville, Tennessee, and at other locations.
A federal affidavit subsequently described allegations that some Pilot employees had systematically reduced diesel-fuel rebates and discounts that had been promised to certain trucking customers.
Pilot Flying J was an enormously important company within the trucking economy. Commercial carriers purchasing thousands or even millions of gallons of fuel could negotiate pricing arrangements materially different from the price displayed to ordinary motorists at a fuel pump. Even a small discrepancy of a few cents per gallon could therefore become substantial when multiplied across large fleets and years of purchases.
The federal investigation focused in part on whether certain customers were deliberately shortchanged.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice's later account of the investigation, fraudulent conduct occurred within Pilot's Direct Sales group. The government described two principal methods: reducing monthly rebate payments owed to customers and reducing off-invoice discounts without the customers' knowledge.
The Department of Justice later said Pilot employees used spreadsheets to document reductions and, in some cases, created supporting documentation intended to justify amounts that had been improperly reduced.
These allegations created an obvious practical problem. Hundreds or thousands of commercial accounts contained years of transactions, different negotiated pricing formulas and enormous quantities of fuel purchases. Determining what individual customers should have paid — and comparing that with what they actually paid — required extensive auditing.
That accounting problem became one of the defining characteristics of the eventual settlement and of DieselRebateSettlement.com itself.
The Class-Action Lawsuit
The settlement website centered on National Trucking Financial Reclamation Services, LLC et al. v. Pilot Corporation et al.
The class representatives included National Trucking Financial Reclamation Services, LLC, Bruce Taylor, Edis Trucking, Inc., Jerry Floyd, Mike Campbell, Paul Otto, Townes Trucking, Inc., and R&R Transportation, Inc.
Pilot Corporation and Pilot Travel Centers LLC doing business as Pilot Flying J were among the defendants, along with other corporate and individual defendants.
The case was one of numerous lawsuits generated by the rebate controversy. Litigation appeared in federal and state courts around the country, and the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation considered requests involving related Pilot Flying J fuel-rebate cases.
This wider litigation explains why the settlement attracted so much attention. The agreement had the potential to resolve claims for a very large class of Pilot Flying J customers rather than merely settle the claims of the original plaintiffs.
Preliminary approval was granted in July 2013. DieselRebateSettlement.com then became an important mechanism for communicating what the settlement actually meant.
Who Qualified for the Settlement?
The class generally covered individuals, businesses and other entities in the United States that purchased over-the-road diesel fuel for commercial use in Class 7 or Class 8 vehicles from Pilot Flying J under qualifying cost-plus or retail-minus rebate or discount arrangements.
The covered period extended from January 1, 2005, through July 15, 2013.
Class 7 vehicles generally have a gross vehicle weight rating of 26,001 to 33,000 pounds, while Class 8 vehicles have a rating above 33,000 pounds. These categories encompass the heavy commercial trucks that form the backbone of long-haul freight transportation.
The settlement did not simply encompass anyone who had purchased diesel at a Pilot or Flying J location. The customer needed to fall within the defined commercial rebate or discount programs.
Ordinary retail discounts received by customers paying cash, check or major credit card at the point of sale were excluded.
That distinction was one reason the website's FAQ material was so important. Eligibility depended upon the customer's commercial relationship with Pilot Flying J, not merely whether the customer had bought diesel there.
Cost-Plus and Retail-Minus Pricing
Two terms appeared repeatedly in the litigation and settlement: "cost-plus" and "retail-minus."
Under a cost-plus arrangement, the customer's negotiated fuel price was based on Pilot Flying J's defined fuel cost plus an agreed amount per gallon.
For example, if the applicable cost was $3.50 per gallon and the customer's agreement called for cost plus 10 cents, the resulting price would be $3.60 per gallon.
A retail-minus arrangement worked from the opposite direction. Instead of starting with cost, it started with the posted retail price and subtracted the negotiated discount. If diesel was listed at $4.00 per gallon and the customer had negotiated a 10-cent retail-minus discount, the customer would pay the equivalent of $3.90 per gallon.
The significance of these arrangements becomes clear at commercial scale. A one-cent discrepancy on a single fill-up might appear trivial. A systematic discrepancy affecting enormous quantities of fuel purchased over months or years could represent significant money for a trucking business.
An Unusual Feature: No Traditional Claim Form
One of the most notable characteristics of the Pilot Flying J settlement was that eligible customers did not have to submit conventional claim forms seeking reimbursement.
Instead, Pilot Flying J was required to audit relevant accounts and calculate whether money was owed.
For an eligible customer, the basic calculation included the unpaid rebate or discount principal, plus simple interest at 6 percent per year for the period during which that money had remained unpaid. Amounts already paid through Pilot Flying J's voluntary repayment program were deducted.
This automatic-payment model made DieselRebateSettlement.com particularly useful. Visitors were not primarily being instructed how to assemble and submit a claim. They were being told how an audit-and-payment process would operate, how they could challenge the results, and what legal rights were affected by remaining in the class.
Independent Review of the Calculations
Given the allegations underlying the litigation, relying exclusively on Pilot Flying J to calculate what Pilot Flying J owed would have created an obvious credibility problem.
The settlement therefore incorporated independent review.
Pilot's auditors examined customer accounts and calculated discrepancies. A court-approved independent accountant was tasked with reviewing the auditing process and using statistical sampling to evaluate whether eligible customers were being properly identified and settlement payments accurately calculated.
Customers also had a mechanism for challenging their individual results.
This was an important feature of the settlement's design. It combined a large-scale internal audit with external verification and ultimately judicial oversight.
By the fall of 2013, Pilot reported that it had reviewed nearly 7,000 diesel-fuel sales accounts. The scope of that effort illustrates the logistical complexity behind what could otherwise sound like a straightforward promise to "pay customers back."
What Did the Settlement Cost?
Early reports about the settlement used varying estimates because the exact amount depended partly on the results of the account audits.
By the time of final approval in November 2013, contemporary reporting put the total at approximately $84.9 million.
The reported breakdown included approximately $56.5 million in principal representing rebate money owed to customers, approximately $9.75 million in interest, approximately $4.5 million in auditing expenses, and as much as $14 million in attorneys' fees, along with other settlement-related expenses.
The settlement therefore went considerably beyond simply returning the original rebate discrepancies.
For affected customers, the most important provision was that they were to receive 100 percent of qualifying unpaid rebates or discounts plus the specified interest.
Important Dates and the Fairness Hearing
DieselRebateSettlement.com served as a calendar as well as an explanation of the case.
Initial settlement notices were scheduled to begin going to class members on August 6, 2013.
October 15, 2013 was a major deadline. Class members who wanted to exclude themselves from the settlement had to submit their requests by the deadline. It was also the deadline for objections.
The distinction mattered.
A class member who objected remained part of the settlement but told the court why some aspect of the agreement should not be approved. A customer who opted out gave up the right to receive benefits under the class settlement but preserved the ability to pursue separate litigation over the released claims.
The final fairness hearing was scheduled for November 25, 2013, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas in Little Rock.
U.S. District Judge James Moody ultimately granted final approval, finding the settlement fair, reasonable and adequate.
Acceptance and Reaction Within the Trucking Industry
Traditional "reviews" of DieselRebateSettlement.com are difficult to identify because this was not a consumer service that people normally rated on review platforms.
A more useful measure of reception is the response to the settlement itself.
Contemporary trucking-industry reporting indicated that relatively few eligible customers rejected the arrangement. Transport Topics reported in October 2013 that 53 customers out of roughly 7,000 potentially eligible customers had formally declined to participate by that stage. Later reporting around final approval described approximately one percent of affected class members as opting out and noted that no class member had filed an objection with the court.
That did not mean the settlement was universally embraced.
Attorneys representing some trucking companies criticized the agreement, and some customers chose to pursue separate claims. Related lawsuits continued outside the settlement process.
Nevertheless, the low opt-out rate became an important argument for supporters of the settlement, who characterized the agreement as an efficient way of returning money to a large group of affected businesses without forcing every carrier to litigate independently.
The Website's Menu and Information Architecture
DieselRebateSettlement.com was structured around the questions a potential class member was most likely to ask.
Its FAQ and navigation topics included basic information, who was included in the settlement, settlement benefits, exclusion from the settlement, objections, lawyers representing the class, the court's fairness hearing, what happened if a customer did nothing, and how to obtain additional information.
That organization reflected the site's practical goal.
A trucking-company owner arriving at the site did not need a lengthy history of class-action law. The visitor needed answers to questions such as: Am I included? How much could I receive? Do I need to file anything? What happens if I disagree with the audit? Can I opt out? What rights do I surrender? When will checks be mailed?
The site translated an unusually complicated combination of commercial contracts, federal litigation and forensic accounting into a comparatively straightforward decision structure.
Location and Geographic Reach
DieselRebateSettlement.com did not represent a conventional physical business with a storefront location.
The litigation was administered through the federal court in Little Rock, Arkansas. The website listed a Pilot Flying J Settlement Administrator mailing address in Plano, Texas, while Pilot Flying J itself was headquartered in Knoxville, Tennessee.
Its real geographic reach, however, was national.
The settlement concerned qualifying commercial diesel purchases from Pilot Flying J locations throughout the United States. Consequently, the site's audience could include trucking companies and fleet operators from virtually anywhere in the country.
This nationwide reach distinguished the case from a dispute involving a single truck stop, regional fuel distributor or isolated contract.
Payments and the Settlement's Later Stages
The process continued after final court approval.
By January 2014, Pilot Flying J reported that approximately 95 percent of the roughly 5,500 trucking companies owed money under the approved settlement had already received payments. Those payments included both the rebate amounts found to be due and the settlement's 6 percent interest.
The settlement also contemplated what would happen to checks that were never cashed or could not be delivered.
Rather than allowing that money simply to revert to Pilot Flying J, remaining amounts were to be redistributed on a pro-rata basis among eligible class members who had cashed or deposited their initial checks.
DieselRebateSettlement.com eventually carried a January 19, 2016 update announcing the final settlement-check stage. Eligible class members had previously received payments for discrepancies plus interest, and the remaining uncashed settlement funds were being redistributed proportionately.
That update effectively marked the closing phase of a process that had begun amid extraordinary publicity nearly three years earlier.
The Criminal Investigation Beyond the Settlement
The civil settlement documented by DieselRebateSettlement.com was only one part of the Pilot Flying J story.
In July 2014, Pilot Travel Centers entered into a Criminal Enforcement Agreement with the United States.
The Department of Justice said the fraudulent conduct by Pilot employees caused more than $56 million in losses to customers. Pilot accepted legal responsibility for its employees' criminal conduct, agreed to make full restitution to victims and agreed to pay a $92 million monetary penalty.
The company was also required to cooperate with the continuing federal investigation and maintain internal accounting controls and compliance procedures intended to prevent similar misconduct.
Individual employees faced criminal prosecution. Numerous former Pilot employees pleaded guilty, and the federal investigation eventually produced a major criminal trial involving former company executives and employees.
This subsequent history adds significance to DieselRebateSettlement.com. The website appeared at a comparatively early stage of a controversy that would continue generating legal proceedings and national headlines for years.
Press and Media Coverage
The rebate controversy received extensive coverage from both mainstream news organizations and trucking-industry publications.
The Associated Press reported on the final $84.9 million settlement and the estimated 5,500 trucking companies affected. Transport Topics closely followed the litigation, opt-outs, account audits and final approval. Commercial Carrier Journal covered both the settlement and Pilot's subsequent progress in making payments. Heavy Duty Trucking reported on the court's approval and its significance for carriers.
The story also drew unusual mainstream attention because Pilot Flying J CEO Jimmy Haslam was the owner of the Cleveland Browns and the brother of then-Tennessee Governor Bill Haslam.
That connection meant a commercial trucking dispute crossed into sports, business and political news.
For the trucking industry itself, however, the core issue was much more practical: whether carriers had received the diesel prices they had negotiated and whether a large fuel supplier could be trusted to calculate complex rebates correctly.
Popularity and Audience
No reliable public traffic statistics from the site's 2013 peak were located during research, so it would be misleading to assign DieselRebateSettlement.com a specific visitor count or popularity ranking.
Its potential audience can nevertheless be estimated from the settlement's scope.
Approximately 5,500 trucking companies ultimately figured in reporting about the approved settlement, while Pilot's broader audit reportedly examined roughly 7,000 customer accounts.
The site's importance was therefore concentrated rather than mass-market. It was unlikely to compete with mainstream news sites for millions of casual visitors, but for affected fleet owners, accountants, transportation attorneys and commercial fuel customers, it provided highly consequential information.
Its value came from relevance rather than entertainment or general popularity.
Ownership, Administration and the Role of Pilot Flying J
It is useful to distinguish the company at the center of the dispute from the legal administration of the settlement website.
Pilot Flying J was the principal corporate defendant and was responsible for performing the account audits and funding the settlement obligations. The court supervised the settlement, class counsel represented affected customers, an independent accountant reviewed the auditing process, and a settlement administrator handled communications.
Thus, DieselRebateSettlement.com was associated with a court-supervised legal process involving multiple parties rather than functioning simply as Pilot Flying J's ordinary corporate website.
Historical sources clearly establish its official settlement role. They do not provide enough reliable evidence to attribute present ownership of the domain to the same entity, so current domain ownership should not be assumed from the site's original function.
Awards and Recognition
No significant website-design awards, legal-industry awards or other formal honors for DieselRebateSettlement.com were identified in the sources reviewed.
That is not particularly surprising.
Settlement websites are generally judged by functional standards: whether notices are accessible, deadlines are clear, documents can be obtained and affected people can understand their rights. They are not normally built to compete for design awards or broad consumer recognition.
DieselRebateSettlement.com's notable achievement was therefore functional rather than ceremonial. It provided a centralized public record of an unusually complex national settlement.
Cultural and Social Significance
The controversy has lasting significance within trucking because diesel purchasing is fundamental to the economics of commercial transportation.
Fuel is one of the largest operating expenses for a trucking company. Large fleets negotiate discounts precisely because tiny changes in per-gallon costs become substantial when spread over millions of miles and large fuel volumes.
The Pilot Flying J controversy demonstrated the vulnerability created when complex commercial pricing depends on calculations performed largely out of the customer's sight.
It also illustrated why transparency, electronic accounting, independent auditing and compliance controls matter in business-to-business transactions.
Pilot subsequently said it had moved manual rebate accounts to electronic systems and established additional compliance measures. The scandal therefore became not merely a story about money that had allegedly been withheld, but also a cautionary example about internal controls and the trust required in high-volume commercial relationships.
Why DieselRebateSettlement.com Still Matters
Most settlement websites are temporary by nature. They appear when litigation reaches a resolution, remain active while notices, objections, hearings and payments are processed, and eventually become obsolete.
That makes surviving material from DieselRebateSettlement.com particularly useful as a historical record.
It captures the mechanics of the Pilot Flying J settlement at the moment when thousands of trucking companies were deciding what to do. It explains who qualified, how payments were calculated, why independent accounting review was required, how customers could challenge calculations and what rights they surrendered by remaining in the class.
It also provides a bridge between several phases of the larger story: the April 2013 federal raids, the wave of civil litigation, the July settlement, final court approval in November 2013, payments to thousands of carriers, the 2014 federal criminal agreement and the eventual redistribution of remaining settlement money in 2016.
For historians of trucking, commercial litigation or corporate compliance, that makes the domain more informative than its plain name might suggest.
DieselRebateSettlement.com was essentially the public-facing administrative hub for one of the most consequential fuel-rebate disputes in modern American trucking. Its audience was specialized, its lifespan as an active settlement resource was limited, and it was never intended to be a popular general-interest destination. Yet for thousands of commercial carriers trying to understand whether they had been shortchanged — and what would be done about it — the information it provided had immediate financial and legal importance.